Tournament Guide: Stanford résumé
Note: Insider gets you ready for the NCAA Tournament with complete scouting reports on all 65 teams and in-depth bracket analysis to help you project the field all the way to San Antonio. Plus, you can follow all the games on your desktop with our discreet RealTime Scoreboard.
Stanford's complete Bracketology chart
Take a look inside the data used by the tournament selection committee in seeding the bracket.
Points Per Game
3PT ratio (of FG) FT pct.
(6-2, 190, SO)
(6-4, 205, SR)
(6-8, 205, JR)
(6-6, 200, JR)
(6-10, 265, JR)
10.6 ppg, 4.7 apg
12.3 ppg, 3.7 rpg
15.2 ppg, 7.4 rpg
6.6 ppg, 3.7 rpg
10.3 ppg, 5.4 rpg
Tough, relentless leader.
Unafraid to take big shot; underrated defender.
Caught fire in Feb. after missing nine games.
Versatile player who has filled in where needed.
Has improved stamina and is steady low-post presence.
(6-9, 230, SR)
(6-10, 225, SO)
11.5 ppg, 6.9 rpg
7.0 ppg, 4.4 rpg
Missed 10 games with knee injury; return is key.
Rangy big man with strong offensive skills.
There have been a few, but Nick Robinson's 35-foot, running 3-pointer to beat Arizona and virtually end the Pac-10 race was huge.
Not much to choose from here, but with a chance to become the first 18-0 team in Pac-10 history, the Cardinal didn't seem its aggressive self in the closing loss at Washington.
Most Revealing Moment
Stanford didn't trail often this season, but was down 19 in the second half at Oregon's McArthur Court, a notoriously tough place for visitors. Chris Hernandez scored all 22 of his points in the second half and virtually willed an 83-80 victory.
Did You Know?
Josh Childress was voted Pac-10 Player of the Year despite not playing during the pre-conference season.
Stanford can play the game various ways. The Cardinal is a traditionally strong half court offensive team, and has the combination of good big men and excellent perimeter shooters to make it work.
Stanford mixes man-to-man with zone, but plays a conservative, position-style defense. The Cardinal almost never presses, but rebounds extremely well.
It goes against the reputation, but Stanford runs a very capable fast break.
Power forward Justin Davis missed 10 straight games entering the Pac-10 Tournament with a knee injury, and his absence diminishes the Cardinal, especially against physical opponents. He will be rusty at best for the NCAAs, but Stanford needs his body on the floor.
Will Lose When ...
Stanford was put back on its heels by Washington's quickness and aggressiveness. But it's only happened once, so it's hard to know if that's a weakness or just one bad day.
Famous Last Words
The pressure of staying perfect is now gone, and that may give Stanford a fresh outlook for the postseason.
Tournament History (1985-2003)
Overall NCAA History
NCAA appearances: 11 (of 19)
Seed average: 5.36
Highest seed No. 1 (2000, 2001)
Lowest seed: No. 12 (1992)
Biggest upset: 1997 vs. No. 3 Wake Forest
Most upsetting: 1989 vs. No. 14 Sienna
Bracketology score: 0.86
NCAA appearances: 12
All-time record: 18-11 (.621)
Best finish: 1942, national champions
Coach's NCAA record: Mike Montgomery (15-11, .577)
Inside N-C Luna vs. vs. Bad Cls Lst
Team Sd RPI RPI RPI SOS 1-25 26-50 L L 10 B-Scr OffQ DefQ ASM
Stanford 1 6 29 4 104 2-0 2-0 0 0 9-1 0.86 2.2 11.2 13.4
S.Antonio 16 199 291 152 290 0-1 0-0 10 3 9-1 1.00 3.1 0.0 3.1
So.Ill. 9 25 41 19 101 0-0 0-1 0 0 8-2 1.40 3.6 5.9 9.5
Alabama 8 26 5 26 1 2-6 2-5 0 4 6-4 0.96 5.7 3.9 9.6
Quad Comparison Key
Insider's replication of the Ratings Percentage Index.
RPI in non-conference games only.
Joe Lunardi's "predictive" RPI.
Strenth of Schedule (all games).
Record vs. 1-25 RPI teams.
Record vs. 26-50 RPI teams.
Losses to teams ranked below 150 in the RPI.
Losses by 3 points or less or in overtime.
Record in Last 10 games before tourney.
Bracketology Scores measure whether a team more often "exceeds" its seed or "falls short" of expectation (average B-Score is 1.00).
Offensive Quotient (average points per game by which a team exceeds/falls below the aggregate defense of its opponents).
Defensive Quotient (average points per game allowed below/above the aggregate offense of its opponents).
Adjusted Scoring Margin (OffQ+DefQ) has accurately predicted 10 of the last 16 Final Four participants).